Please, contribute
--
MicheleLanzetta? - 16 Jul 2004
We are doing a lot of work with claws and would like to also develop a "spine" technology, but still it is not clear how a spine should work, so maybe a detailed comparison could help. Posing and answering questions could help better characterize a spine.
| Feature |
Claw |
Spine |
Notes |
| Total number |
few |
many |
|
| Active |
single or few |
load shared |
|
| Legs |
front/intermediate |
front/intermediate/rear |
insects preferably climb UP |
| Length |
- |
shorter |
|
| Lower bound constraint |
both should be as small as possible |
limited by bearable load/fabrication/roughness |
| Diameter |
sharp end |
both can be taper |
| Shape |
curved |
straight |
|
| Stiffness |
high |
lower |
when hooking the optimal angle should be preserved |
| Function |
hooking |
hooking/thrust |
|
| Relative hardness |
maximum |
high |
|
| Axial Compliance |
some |
on the spined surface |
|
| Lateral Compliance |
low |
one way |
|
| Surface interaction |
penetration/hooking |
penetration/hooking and friction |
|
| Normal force |
high |
well distributed |
|
| Moment |
favourable |
determined by spined surface configuration |
|
| Load type |
mainly at the tip |
can be on the lateral surface |
shear force for both |
| Configuration |
claws and spined surfaces are interchangeable depending on the position of the load application |
| Wall roughness |
high |
low |
this is a just a scale issue, they can interact in the same way |