Please, contribute
--
MicheleLanzetta? - 16 Jul 2004
We are doing a lot of work with claws and would like to also develop a "spine" technology, but still it is not clear how a spine should work, so maybe a detailed comparison could help. Posing and answering questions could help better characterize a spine.
Feature |
Claw |
Spine |
Notes |
Total number |
few |
many |
|
Active |
single or few |
load shared |
|
Legs |
front/intermediate |
front/intermediate/rear |
insects preferably climb UP |
Length |
- |
shorter |
|
Lower bound constraint |
both should be as small as possible |
limited by bearable load/fabrication/roughness |
Diameter |
sharp end |
both can be taper |
Shape |
curved |
straight |
|
Stiffness |
high |
lower |
when hooking the optimal angle should be preserved |
Function |
hooking |
hooking/thrust |
|
Relative hardness |
maximum |
high |
|
Axial Compliance |
some |
on the spined surface |
|
Lateral Compliance |
low |
one way |
|
Surface interaction |
penetration/hooking |
penetration/hooking and friction |
|
Normal force |
high |
well distributed |
|
Moment |
favourable |
determined by spined surface configuration |
|
Load type |
mainly at the tip |
can be on the lateral surface |
shear force for both |
Configuration |
claws and spined surfaces are interchangeable depending on the position of the load application |
Wall roughness |
high |
low |
this is a just a scale issue, they can interact in the same way |